Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Munoz C, Ellis S, Nekolla SG, Kunze KP, Vitadello T, Neji R, Botnar RM, Schnabel JA, Reader AJ, Prieto C. MR-guided motion-corrected PET image reconstruction for cardiac PET-MR. J Nucl Med. 2021 May 28:jnumed.120.254235. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.254235. (2021)

MR-guided motion-corrected PET image reconstruction for cardiac PET-MR

Revista : J Nucl Med
Tipo de publicación : Publicaciones WOS sin afiliación UC Ir a publicación


Simultaneous PET-MR imaging has shown potential for the comprehensive assessment of myocardial health from a single examination. Furthermore, MR-derived respiratory motion information has been shown to improve PET image quality by incorporating this information into the PET image reconstruction. Separately, MR-based anatomically guided PET image reconstruction has been shown to perform effective denoising, but this has been so far demonstrated mainly in brain imaging. To date the combined benefits of motion compensation and anatomical guidance have not been demonstrated for myocardial PET-MR imaging. This work addresses this by proposing a single cardiac PET-MR image reconstruction framework which fully utilises MR-derived information to allow both motion compensation and anatomical guidance within the reconstruction. Methods: Fifteen patients underwent a 18F-FDG cardiac PET-MR scan with a previously introduced acquisition framework. The MR data processing and image reconstruction pipeline produces respiratory motion fields and a high-resolution respiratory motion-corrected MR image with good tissue contrast. This MR-derived information was then included in a respiratory motion-corrected, cardiac-gated, anatomically guided image reconstruction of the simultaneously acquired PET data. Reconstructions were evaluated by measuring myocardial contrast and noise and compared to images from several comparative intermediate methods using the components of the proposed framework separately. Results: Including respiratory motion correction, cardiac gating, and anatomical guidance significantly increased contrast. In particular, myocardium-to-blood pool contrast increased by 143% on average (p<0.0001) compared to conventional uncorrected, non-guided PET images. Furthermore, anatomical guidance significantly reduced image noise compared to non-guided image reconstruction by 16.1% (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The proposed framework for MR-derived motion compensation and anatomical guidance of cardiac PET data was shown to significantly improve image quality compared to alternative reconstruction methods. Each component of the reconstruction pipeline was shown to have a positive impact on the final image quality. These improvements have the potential to improve clinical interpretability and diagnosis based on cardiac PET-MR images.